SGM HomeAbout SGM LLP a leading labour law, civil litigation and criminal law firmSGM LLP's LawyersSGM LLP's Practice areas are charter litigation, labour law, employment law, class actionsNews, Events of SGM LLP latest cases, conferences and workshopsCareers at SGM LLP in criminal law, employment law and civil litigationContact SGM for info about labour law, civil litigation and criminal lawFrançais
News and Events
SGM in the News
Client Seminars
Speakers' Corner
News Archives

  • SGM Home
  • News & Events
  •  

Monday, Feb 02, 2009

YUFA given green light to challenge mandatory retirement

Arbitrator Pamela Picher has held that faculty members forced to retire between December 2005, when amendments to the Human Rights Code were passed to abolish mandatory retirement, and December 2006, when the amendments finally came into effect, can challenge their forced retirements under section 54 of the Labour Relations Act. 

Section 54 provides:

"54.  Discrimination Prohibited -  A collective agreement must not discriminate against any person if the discrimination is contrary to the Human Rights Code or the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms."

The arbitrator held that section 54 of the prohibits all collective agreements in Ontario from discriminating against any person if the discrimination is contrary to either the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms or the Human Rights Code, regardless of whether the employer is itself subject to the Charter.

Click here to find out more about this case.

 

 

HomeContact SGM LLPPrivacy PolicyDisclaimer

© SGM LAW 2010